Talk:World Esperanto Congress

Constructed languages: Esperanto Mid‑importance

	Constructed languages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Esperanto task force.

I have removed the line in the table that claimed that the 2016 UK will be in Santiago. The UEA won't be coming out with an official statement on the location of the 101st UK until Spring 2014. At the UK in Reykjavik, the head of Esperanto-USA mentioned the hope of a UK in San Diego. The representative of the Chilean group simply offered greetings. Jaidit (talk) 16:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

please note, the table was taken from the German encyclopedia so some city names may not be translated yet. Revolución 02:48, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Anyway, Santiago is a different place from San Diego. Dawud (talk) 07:08, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When will a universal congress take place in Africa? Kiam universala kongreso okazos en afriko?

If this list of places represents the Esperanto-speaking community, then it looks like that community is about 90% or so in Europe - apart from a few meetings in Japan, S.Korea, P.R.China and Cuba, hardly any seem to be outside of Europe. i guess this can be understood: Latin Americans get by with spanish/portuguese as being close enough to each other and understood in the whole region, North Americans and Africans have English and French as a lingua franca. Since European colonisation of East Asia failed, a lot of people in Europe and Asia who want an easier alternative to English can understandably feel that Esperanto could be a good intermediary language... Boud (talk) 22:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They try to alternate between Europe, Asia, and the Americas. The scheme (which does tend to shortchange Africa, as you say) has little to do with where E-ists are concentrated. For example, Iran has a large-ish community, but would be unable to meet the conditions of a UK (such as guaranteeing visas for participants, not to mention their freedom of speech). Europe does seem to attract the most participation--whether because more E-ists live there, or because Europeans have more time and money to waste on artificial language pursuits.Dawud (talk) 07:07, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

World or Universal?

I think the headline should be "Universal Congress of Esperanto", not "World".

This is the literal translation. Besides, there are several World Congresses of Esperanto each year (e. g. the SAT congress), but only one of them is universal (i. e. not specialized).

Gunnar Gällmo (talk) 14:11, 4 October 2010 (UTC) (bug report) the number of participants is sorted alphabetically, not numerically! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.195.201.19 (talk) 16:12, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The title of the article

The official English name of the event is “World Esperanto Congress” (see at the website of UEA: http://uea.org/kongresoj/partners). I have succeeded in changing it in the article itself, but it needs to be changed also in the title. Who can help me with it? --Fiskot (talk) 22:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree Marek Mazurkiewicz (talk) 17:37, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, why not. I filed the WP:RM as uncontroversial technical request, I doubt there will be any serious opposition to the move. //Halibu tt 13:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on World Esperanto Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130503134903/http://uea.org/kongresoj/uk_2013.html to http://uea.org/kongresoj/uk_2013.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120213023209/http://uea.org/kongresoj/uk_2012.html to http://uea.org/kongresoj/uk_2012.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://uea.org/pdf/vikinga_vocho_6_sab2.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120213023209/http://uea.org/kongresoj/uk_2012.html to http://uea.org/kongresoj/uk_2012.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:11, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]